Marketing Theory

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jaju, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Marketing Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, 201-224 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/147059310100100203

Marketing Images

Construct Definition, Measurement Issues, and Theory Development

Barbara Stern

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USAbbstern{at}aol.com

George M. Zinkhan

University of Georgia, USAgzinkhan{at}terry.uga.edu

Anupam Jaju

University of Georgia, USAajaju{at}arches.uga.edu

This article examines inconsistent usage of the term ‘image’ in reference to brand, corporate, and store images and the measurement problems that have prevented theory development. It first traces the history of the term’s ambiguous usage in marketing and consumer behavior research, and presents classification systems for organizing post-1950s definitions into parsimonious groups. Next, it provides an overview of measurement problems related to the lack of nominal and operational definitions. It ends with a summary of where we are now and what needs to be done to advance theory development.

Key Words: brand image • corporate image • image • store image


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
A. Jaju, C. Joiner, and S. K. Reddy
Consumer Evaluations of Corporate Brand Redeployments
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 206 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
B. B. Stern
What Does Brand Mean? Historical-Analysis Method and Construct Definition
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
J. E. Schroeder
Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on aesthetics, images and vision
Marketing Theory, March 1, 2006; 6(1): 5 - 10.
[PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
A. Venkatesh and L. A. Meamber
Arts and aesthetics: Marketing and cultural production
Marketing Theory, March 1, 2006; 6(1): 11 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
B. T. Venable, G. M. Rose, V. D. Bush, and F. W. Gilbert
The Role of Brand Personality in Charitable Giving: An Assessment and Validation
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 1, 2005; 33(3): 295 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
C. Simoes, S. Dibb, and R. P. Fisk
Managing Corporate Identity: An Internal Perspective
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2005; 33(2): 153 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]