Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Marketing Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Malley, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly-Holmes, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Death of a metaphor: reviewing the `marketing as relationships' frame

Lisa O'Malley

University of Limerick, lisa.omalley{at}ul.ie

Maurice Patterson

University of Limerick

Helen Kelly-Holmes

University of Limerick

The frame marketing as relationships is central to contemporary marketing thought and informs both research and practice in marketing. It is underpinned by the `interpersonal relationship' metaphor, which at the superordinate level relies upon social exchange theory (SET) and at the subordinate level reinforces the ideological values of Judeo—Christian marriages. The current pervasiveness of the marketing as relationships frame suggests that this view of marketing has become commonsensical, taken-for-granted and recognized by marketers as simply part of their discourse. In this paper, we trace the evolution of the marketing as relationships frame and analyse its current position. Using insights drawn from conceptual metaphor theory and critical discourse analysis, we argue that it is necessary to reactivate this metaphor in order to investigate whether it is relevant to current theory and practice in marketing.

Key Words: interpersonal relationship metaphor • relationship marketing • Social Exchange Theory

Marketing Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 167-187 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1470593108089203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Tadajewski
The foundations of relationship marketing: reciprocity and trade relations
Marketing Theory, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 9 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]